H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Anne Kremer H2H: 1-1

Jelena Kostanic Tosic and Anne Kremer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2004 Philadelphia round of 32 6-4 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Kostanic Tosic
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #35 6-4 2-6 7-5 Anne Kremer #97 Match data Nov 4, 2004* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anne Kremer #35 6-3 6-2 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #121 Match data Nov 17, 2000* R16 Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Kostanic Tosic — #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Kremer — #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,577 0 0 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,535 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,513 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,518 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 103.8 — — — — — +41 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1512 116.4 — — — — +24 +37 — 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1524 108.3 — — — — +37 +30 — 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1560 116.2 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 2002 1572 111.3 — — — — -21 +33 — 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 — 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 — 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 — 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09 1999 1640 130.4 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 — -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2007 1535 105.8 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +39 +65 — 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — -0.41 2001 1696 135.0 — — — — +1 -56 +60 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% — +50 — 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 — -0.46 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2010 1473 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.15 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 118.4 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -39 +123 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1461 103.4 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +17 +102 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.28
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1475 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1464 94.4 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +13 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.18
Career — 1710 122.0 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.2 +0.46 — 1810 132.3 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +2 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.