H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-0
Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2000 Antwerp fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2000* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-3 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |