H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-2

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 San Diego round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Kostanic Tosic
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #23 6-4 6-3 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #32 Match data Jul 29, 2004* R32 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Chanda Rubin #12 6-1 6-3 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #99 Match data Mar 5, 2003 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0
20 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0
21 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1
22 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1
23 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2
24 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3
25 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3
26 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Chanda Rubin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 47/190 of Jelena Kostanic Tosic's and 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Chanda Rubin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 4/36 0.5 3.0 64.8% 51.0% 50.9% 32.3% 40.3% 50.9% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6/48 0.5 2.5 66.8% 51.0% 50.3% 56.5% 44.0% 50.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 5/32 1.6 3.8 67.1% 63.2% 35.8% 50.5% 43.7% 53.6% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 8/37 1.5 2.6 67.9% 56.8% 43.5% 51.7% 53.3% 51.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 17/27 1.6 3.1 67.6% 61.5% 44.5% 53.1% 41.7% 56.0% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 3/6 1.7 2.3 63.3% 62.0% 51.1% 65.9% 10.0% 58.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6%
28 2010 4/4 1.0 4.5 64.0% 46.6% 41.6% 36.1% 38.8% 44.8% 36.4% 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4%
Career — 47/264 1.3 3.1 66.7% 57.4% 44.8% 50.6% 41.8% 53.1% 38.0% — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Chanda Rubin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85
16 1998 1491 103.8 — — — — — +41 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28
17 1999 1512 116.4 — — — — +24 +37 — 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.26 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24
18 2000 1524 108.3 — — — — +37 +30 — 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24
19 2001 1560 116.2 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03
20 2002 1571 111.3 — — — — -20 +34 — 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38
21 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 — 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41
22 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 — 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79
23 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 — 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46
24 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 — -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47
25 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 — 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — -0.47 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54
26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% — +50 — 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 — -0.46 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62
28 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.15 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69
Career — 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43 — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.