H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Dally Randriantefy H2H: 1-0
Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 1–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2004 Charleston fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-3 6-1 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Dally Randriantefy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |