H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 0-2
Henrieta Nagyova holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henrieta Nagyova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henrieta Nagyova won the 2005 Quebec City third round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2005* | Quebec City | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
| Nov 8, 2001* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-4 0-6 6-2 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |