H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 0-1
Mariana Duque-Mariño holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Duque-Mariño leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariana Duque-Mariño won the 2008 Bogota third round 6-4 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mariana Duque-Mariño | 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |