H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 2-0
Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 2–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2004 Amelia Island second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2004* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-4 6-2 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-3 6-1 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Marlene Weingartner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |