H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2004 Hyderabad quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Kostanic Tosic
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #59 6-4 7-5 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #65 Match data Feb 21, 2004* QF Hyderabad Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 103.8 — — — — — +41 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1512 116.4 — — — — +24 +37 — 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.26 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 2000 1524 108.3 — — — — +37 +30 — 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2001 1560 116.2 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2002 1571 111.3 — — — — -20 +34 — 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 — 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 — 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 — 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 — -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 — 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — -0.47 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% — +50 — 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 — -0.46 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.15 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.