H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-2
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-0 7-5 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |