H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Tatiana Perebiynis H2H: 2-0
Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2004 Charleston second round 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | Tatiana Perebiynis | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2003* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-2 6-2 | Tatiana Perebiynis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,608 | 39 | 69 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Tatiana Perebiynis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |