H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Yuliya Beygelzimer H2H: 1-0
Jelena Kostanic Tosic holds a 1–0 lead over Yuliya Beygelzimer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Kostanic Tosic won the 2002 Vienna third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 42
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2002* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 7-5 6-3 | Yuliya Beygelzimer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yuliya Beygelzimer | #706 | #83 | 430 | 1,500 | 11 | 40 | 21.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Yuliya Beygelzimer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #122 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #226 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #216 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |