H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jennifer Capriati vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-1
Jennifer Capriati holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jennifer Capriati leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2000 Luxembourg semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1998* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data |
| May 15, 1992* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jennifer Capriati | 7-5 6-3 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |