H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jennifer Capriati holds a 6–5 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 5–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Eastbourne Open semifinal 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data | Jun 21, 2003* | SF | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Jennifer Capriati | 6-2 6-4 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Mar 24, 2003* | SF | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Chanda Rubin | 6-4 6-2 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data | Nov 3, 2000* | F | Quebec City | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Chanda Rubin | 6-0 6-7(11) 6-2 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data | Oct 5, 2000* | R32 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Jennifer Capriati | 6-1 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Mar 23, 2000* | R32 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jennifer Capriati | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Nov 7, 1999* | F | Quebec City | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Chanda Rubin | 7-6 6-2 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data | May 7, 1997* | R64 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Jennifer Capriati | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Jan 9, 1997* | R32 | Sydney International | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Chanda Rubin | 6-3 6-3 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data | Mar 16, 1996* | R16 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jennifer Capriati | 6-2 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Aug 19, 1993* | R32 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jennifer Capriati | 6-0 7-5 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Jun 24, 1992* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,253 | 411 | 170 | 70.7% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,042 | 345 | 232 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,193 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 35–11 | 76.1% | #7 | 2,204 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,156 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,133 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,934 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,078 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,910 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,908 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,096 | 2 | 12 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 14 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,020 | 3 | 14 | 2004 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #52 | 1,858 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,820 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,718 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1990 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 20 | 3 | 23 | 87.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1991 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1992 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 18 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1996 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1996 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1997 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1997 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% |
| 22 | 1998 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1998 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 23 | 1999 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1999 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2000 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 65.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2000 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 2001 | 32 | 10 | 42 | 76.2% | 16 | 2 | 18 | 88.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2001 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 27 | 15 | 42 | 64.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 28 | 2004 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 213 | 88 | 301 | 70.8% | 121 | 47 | 168 | 72.0% | 46 | 15 | 61 | 75.4% | 31 | 20 | 51 | 60.8% | — | 201 | 135 | 336 | 59.8% | 66 | 47 | 113 | 58.4% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% | 42 | 27 | 69 | 60.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 31/101 of Jennifer Capriati's and 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | 2003 | 15/60 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 57.8% | 71.0% | 51.8% | 55.7% | 53.2% | 63.1% | 53.5% | 2003 | 9/63 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 60.3% | 59.5% | 50.1% | 50.9% | 48.1% | 56.0% | 48.6% |
| 28 | 2004 | 16/41 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 64.8% | 67.6% | 51.8% | 43.9% | 45.7% | 61.7% | 47.4% | 2004 | 7/29 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 63.3% | 64.2% | 47.5% | 49.3% | 53.5% | 58.1% | 48.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6/8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 69.5% | 55.1% | 44.9% | 36.1% | 40.3% | 51.5% | 33.4% |
| Career | — | 31/581 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 61.4% | 69.2% | 51.8% | 49.6% | 49.3% | 62.4% | 50.4% | — | 22/577 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 63.8% | 59.8% | 47.9% | 46.4% | 47.7% | 55.4% | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1990 | 1962 | 165.3 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -118 | -299 | 73.8% | +1.71 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 108.9 | -1.20 | 1990 | 1489 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 15 | 1991 | 2193 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -251 | -410 | 73.6% | +1.89 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 103.7 | -2.21 | 1991 | 1584 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 56.3% | +0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.85 |
| 16 | 1992 | 2204 | 166.4 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -116 | -327 | 70.8% | +1.41 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.0 | -3.08 | 1992 | 1617 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -100 | — | 40.7% | -0.90 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.5 | +0.28 |
| 17 | 1993 | 2157 | 170.7 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -75 | -205 | 66.3% | +1.68 | 11–7 (61%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.4 | -2.41 | 1993 | 1653 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -47 | +2 | 46.6% | -0.53 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–1 | — | -0.24 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2134 | 109.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 | 1994 | 1804 | 148.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -107 | — | 58.4% | +0.56 | 10–5 (67%) | 8–2 (80%) | 111.5 | -1.24 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1934 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -151 | -210 | 64.6% | +1.22 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 103.9 | +0.03 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2079 | 163.0 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 64.0% | +0.96 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.1 | -1.41 | 1996 | 1986 | 164.3 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 60.9% | +0.84 | 9–1 (90%) | 2–3 (40%) | 106.7 | -1.38 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1911 | 146.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +101 | — | 49.0% | -0.27 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.7 | -1.31 | 1997 | 1814 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | +40 | +33 | — | 53.2% | +0.21 | 6–4 (60%) | 8–4 (67%) | 104.2 | -2.41 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1764 | 130.1 | — | — | — | — | +84 | +151 | — | 45.8% | -0.23 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.36 | 1998 | 1800 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +15 | -63 | 49.4% | +0.27 | 7–4 (64%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.7 | -0.79 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1912 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +15 | — | 59.1% | +0.65 | 10–2 (83%) | 2–3 (40%) | 106.4 | -2.28 | 1999 | 1839 | 156.4 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -68 | — | 62.2% | +0.81 | 5–10 (33%) | 8–3 (73%) | 98.5 | -2.46 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1909 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -74 | +142 | 59.5% | +0.65 | 11–4 (73%) | 10–3 (77%) | 108.8 | -1.61 | 2000 | 1941 | 157.5 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -111 | -226 | 61.4% | +0.66 | 14–9 (61%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.4 | -2.47 |
| 25 | 2001 | 2097 | 171.2 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -19 | +31 | 73.3% | +1.61 | 16–11 (59%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.6 | -3.91 | 2001 | 1816 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -63 | -24 | 52.2% | +0.17 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.0 | -0.54 |
| 26 | 2002 | 2020 | 164.6 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +70 | +124 | 69.1% | +1.58 | 14–9 (61%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.3 | -0.66 | 2002 | 1962 | 162.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -101 | +11 | 68.5% | +1.48 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | 109.0 | -3.02 |
| 27 | 2003 | 2022 | 162.1 | +5.66 | +6.87 | 1.449 | 58.1% | +9 | +59 | +108 | 68.6% | +1.42 | 9–14 (39%) | 6–6 (50%) | 92.2 | -0.42 | 2003 | 1918 | 157.5 | +1.04 | +3.08 | 1.104 | 51.9% | -9 | +11 | +142 | 62.9% | +0.85 | 13–6 (68%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.3 | -0.62 |
| 28 | 2004 | 2020 | 149.6 | +5.09 | +3.12 | 1.238 | 54.1% | -61 | +96 | +157 | 65.6% | +1.08 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–5 (38%) | 101.8 | -1.09 | 2004 | 1858 | 136.0 | +2.06 | +2.08 | 1.157 | 53.1% | +22 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.65 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.4 | +0.02 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1821 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1719 | 114.3 | -0.94 | -3.06 | 0.688 | 42.2% | +24 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.75 | — | — | — | -0.69 |
| Career | — | 2253 | 169.4 | +5.37 | +4.93 | 1.338 | 56.1% | -14 | -17 | -51 | 66.6% | +1.25 | 106–76 (58%) | 58–46 (56%) | 103.9 | -3.83 | — | 2043 | 157.5 | +0.82 | +1.09 | 0.996 | 49.6% | +13 | -69 | -49 | 57.4% | +0.52 | 103–69 (60%) | 62–47 (57%) | 110.6 | -2.61 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Williams | 7 | 10 | 17 | Sep 9, 2004 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 5 | 11 | 16 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 5 | 9 | 14 | Mar 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 3 | 9 | 12 | Aug 24, 2003 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 16, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 3 | 9 | 12 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 2 | 9 | 11 | Sep 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jun 22, 2003 | H2H |
| Jennifer Capriati | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jun 21, 2003 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 8, 2004 | H2H |