H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jennifer Capriati vs Helena Sukova H2H: 3-1
Jennifer Capriati holds a 3–1 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jennifer Capriati leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 1992 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1992 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Jennifer Capriati | 7-6 6-1 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1991* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-4 6-4 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1990* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-3 6-2 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-1 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |