H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jennifer Capriati vs Martina Hingis H2H: 4-5

Martina Hingis holds a 5–4 lead over Jennifer Capriati in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Jennifer Capriati leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2002 Australian Open final 4-6 7-6(7) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jennifer Capriati
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 5
9 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jennifer Capriati #1 4-6 7-6(7) 6-2 Martina Hingis #4 Match data Jan 28, 2002* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jennifer Capriati #4 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Jun 9, 2001* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jennifer Capriati #5 6-0 4-6 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Apr 22, 2001* F Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Jennifer Capriati #7 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Jan 29, 2001* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Jennifer Capriati #16 Match data Oct 14, 2000* SF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-2 Jennifer Capriati #18 Match data Jun 24, 2000* SF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-0 Jennifer Capriati #30 Match data Oct 8, 1999* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-3 Jennifer Capriati #227 Match data May 2, 1998* QF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Martina Hingis #6 6-1 5-7 6-1 Jennifer Capriati #37 Match data Jan 12, 1997* F Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jennifer Capriati #54 #1 5,123 2,253 411 170 70.7% 3 1 2 0 2 6 14
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 0 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jennifer Capriati Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1990 37–11 77.1% #8 1,962 0 1 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 1991 39–11 78.0% #6 2,193 0 3 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 1992 35–11 76.1% #7 2,204 0 5 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 1993 30–11 73.2% #9 2,156 0 6 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #42 2,133 0 6 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 — — — — — — — 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 1996 16–9 64.0% #36 2,078 0 6 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 1997 10–12 45.5% #65 1,910 0 6 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 1998 8–12 40.0% #99 1,764 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 1999 26–13 66.7% #23 1,912 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 2000 35–19 64.8% #14 1,908 0 9 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2001 56–14 80.0% #2 2,096 2 12 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2002 48–16 75.0% #3 2,019 3 13 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43
27 2003 42–18 70.0% #6 2,022 3 14 — — — — — — —
28 2004 29–12 70.7% #10 2,020 3 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jennifer Capriati Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 1990 18 4 22 81.8% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1991 20 3 23 87.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1992 10 3 13 76.9% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 1993 14 4 18 77.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1997 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 14 7 21 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 21 11 32 65.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 32 10 42 76.2% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2002 30 11 41 73.2% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2003 25 11 36 69.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 12 7 19 63.2% 13 4 17 76.5% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 88 301 70.8% 121 47 168 72.0% 46 15 61 75.4% 31 20 51 60.8% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jennifer Capriati Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 1990 1962 165.3 — — — — -89 -118 -299 73.8% +1.71 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 108.9 -1.20 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 1991 2193 172.3 — — — — -39 -251 -410 73.6% +1.89 6–4 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 103.7 -2.21 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 1992 2204 166.4 — — — — -40 -116 -327 70.8% +1.41 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 106.0 -3.08 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 1993 2157 170.7 — — — — +9 -75 -205 66.3% +1.68 11–7 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 -2.41 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 1994 2134 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.17 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 1996 2079 163.0 — — — — +14 — — 64.0% +0.96 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 -1.41 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 1997 1911 146.0 — — — — +17 +101 — 49.0% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 95.7 -1.31 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 1998 1764 130.1 — — — — +84 +151 — 45.8% -0.23 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1912 147.1 — — — — -14 +15 — 59.1% +0.65 10–2 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 106.4 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1909 154.0 — — — — +20 -74 +142 59.5% +0.65 11–4 (73%) 10–3 (77%) 108.8 -1.61 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2001 2097 171.2 — — — — -40 -19 +31 73.3% +1.61 16–11 (59%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -3.91 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2002 2020 164.6 — — — — +15 +70 +124 69.1% +1.58 14–9 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.66 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
27 2003 2022 162.1 +5.66 +6.87 1.449 58.1% +9 +59 +108 68.6% +1.42 9–14 (39%) 6–6 (50%) 92.2 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2020 149.6 +5.09 +3.12 1.238 54.1% -61 +96 +157 65.6% +1.08 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 101.8 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2253 169.4 +5.37 +4.93 1.338 56.1% -14 -17 -51 66.6% +1.25 106–76 (58%) 58–46 (56%) 103.9 -3.83 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.