H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jennifer Capriati vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 8-0

Jennifer Capriati holds an 8–0 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2004 Philadelphia round of 16 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jennifer Capriati
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
8 – 0
8 main-draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jennifer Capriati #9 4-6 6-3 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #44 Match data Nov 5, 2004* R16 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jennifer Capriati #5 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #22 Match data Mar 24, 2003* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Jennifer Capriati #3 6-2 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #30 Match data Sep 1, 2002* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jennifer Capriati #3 6-4 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #25 Match data Aug 2, 2002* R16 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jennifer Capriati #3 7-5 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #14 Match data Aug 18, 2001* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Jennifer Capriati #4 7-5 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #20 Match data Jun 5, 2001* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jennifer Capriati #13 3-6 7-5 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #38 Match data Nov 7, 2000* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Jennifer Capriati #16 7-6(1) 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #55 Match data Jun 29, 2000* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jennifer Capriati #54 #1 5,123 2,253 411 170 70.7% 3 1 2 0 2 6 14
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jennifer Capriati Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 37–11 77.1% #8 1,962 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1991 39–11 78.0% #6 2,193 0 3 — — — — — — —
16 1992 35–11 76.1% #7 2,204 0 5 — — — — — — —
17 1993 30–11 73.2% #9 2,156 0 6 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #42 2,133 0 6 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 1996 16–9 64.0% #36 2,078 0 6 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 1997 10–12 45.5% #65 1,910 0 6 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 1998 8–12 40.0% #99 1,764 0 6 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 1999 26–13 66.7% #23 1,912 0 8 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2000 35–19 64.8% #14 1,908 0 9 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2001 56–14 80.0% #2 2,096 2 12 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2002 48–16 75.0% #3 2,019 3 13 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 2003 42–18 70.0% #6 2,022 3 14 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2004 29–12 70.7% #10 2,020 3 14 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jennifer Capriati Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 18 4 22 81.8% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 20 3 23 87.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 10 3 13 76.9% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 14 4 18 77.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1997 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 1999 14 7 21 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2000 21 11 32 65.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2001 32 10 42 76.2% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2002 30 11 41 73.2% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2003 25 11 36 69.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2004 12 7 19 63.2% 13 4 17 76.5% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 88 301 70.8% 121 47 168 72.0% 46 15 61 75.4% 31 20 51 60.8% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 31/101 of Jennifer Capriati's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jennifer Capriati Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 2003 15/60 2.9 3.9 57.8% 71.0% 51.8% 55.7% 53.2% 63.1% 53.5% 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 2004 16/41 2.5 2.8 64.8% 67.6% 51.8% 43.9% 45.7% 61.7% 47.4% 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
Career — 31/581 2.7 3.3 61.4% 69.2% 51.8% 49.6% 49.3% 62.4% 50.4% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jennifer Capriati Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1962 165.3 — — — — -89 -118 -299 73.8% +1.71 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 108.9 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 2193 172.3 — — — — -39 -251 -410 73.6% +1.89 6–4 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 103.7 -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2204 166.4 — — — — -40 -116 -327 70.8% +1.41 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 106.0 -3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 2157 170.7 — — — — +9 -75 -205 66.3% +1.68 11–7 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 -2.41 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 1994 2134 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.17 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 1996 2079 163.0 — — — — +14 — — 64.0% +0.96 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 -1.41 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 1997 1911 146.0 — — — — +17 +101 — 49.0% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 95.7 -1.31 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 1998 1764 130.1 — — — — +84 +151 — 45.8% -0.23 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.36 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 1999 1912 147.1 — — — — -14 +15 — 59.1% +0.65 10–2 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 106.4 -2.28 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2000 1909 154.0 — — — — +20 -74 +142 59.5% +0.65 11–4 (73%) 10–3 (77%) 108.8 -1.61 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2001 2097 171.2 — — — — -40 -19 +31 73.3% +1.61 16–11 (59%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -3.91 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 2002 2020 164.6 — — — — +15 +70 +124 69.1% +1.58 14–9 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.66 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 2003 2022 162.1 +5.66 +6.87 1.449 58.1% +9 +59 +108 68.6% +1.42 9–14 (39%) 6–6 (50%) 92.2 -0.42 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 2004 2020 149.6 +5.09 +3.12 1.238 54.1% -61 +96 +157 65.6% +1.08 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 101.8 -1.09 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
Career — 2253 169.4 +5.37 +4.93 1.338 56.1% -14 -17 -51 66.6% +1.25 106–76 (58%) 58–46 (56%) 103.9 -3.83 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.