H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jennifer Capriati vs Meilen Tu H2H: 2-0
Jennifer Capriati holds a 2–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2002 Berlin third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2002* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 6-3 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-1 6-3 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |