H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jennifer Capriati vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1
Jennifer Capriati and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 1993 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jennifer Capriati | 6-0 6-1 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1990* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Nathalie Herreman | 6-2 6-4 | Jennifer Capriati | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |