H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jennifer Capriati vs Rita Grande H2H: 3-0
Jennifer Capriati holds a 3–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2002 Australian Open fourth round 6-3 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-3 7-6(9) | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1998* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jennifer Capriati | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 6-1 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Capriati | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |