H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jenny Byrne vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-2
Donna Faber holds a 2–1 lead over Jenny Byrne in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jenny Byrne won the 1992 Taipei third round 2-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jenny Byrne | 2-6 6-4 6-0 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1990* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Donna Faber | 6-3 6-2 | Jenny Byrne | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-1 6-0 | Jenny Byrne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenny Byrne | #610 | #45 | 24 | 1,724 | 59 | 118 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jenny Byrne | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #132 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #119 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #49 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #81 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |