H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jeri Ingram vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1

Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Jeri Ingram in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1994 Jakarta round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeri Ingram
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith 6-1 6-1 Jeri Ingram Match data Apr 28, 1994* R32 Jakarta Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeri Ingram #766 #173 30 1,522 5 13 27.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeri Ingram Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–4 20.0% #198 1,479 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1989 2–4 33.3% #214 1,492 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1990 0–1 0.0% #581 1,483 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1993 2–2 50.0% #198 1,496 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1994 0–1 0.0% #342 1,478 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1996 0–1 0.0% #378 1,465 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeri Ingram Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeri Ingram Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1480 97.3 — — — — +53 — — 18.2% -2.91 1–0 — — +0.44 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1989 1493 109.9 — — — — +40 — — 35.7% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.12 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1990 1484 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1993 1496 107.1 — — — — +35 — — 50.0% -0.38 — — — +0.65 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1994 1478 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.22 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1996 1465 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1522 103.2 — — — — +42 — — 28.2% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +7.56 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.