H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 08:10 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 0-1
Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2011 Pattaya third round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2011* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Akgul Amanmuradova | 6-4 7-6(6) | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |