H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 0-1

Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2011 Pattaya round of 32 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akgul Amanmuradova #72 6-4 7-6(6) Jie Zheng #43 Match data Feb 10, 2011* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7%
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7%
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0%
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8%
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6%
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.