H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Alicia Molik H2H: 2-1

Jie Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2010 Indian Wells Open fourth round 6-3 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #23 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) Alicia Molik #138 Match data Mar 17, 2010* R16 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alicia Molik #171 6-3 4-6 6-2 Jie Zheng #20 Match data Feb 16, 2010* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Jie Zheng #41 6-4 6-2 Alicia Molik #58 Match data Apr 4, 2007* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Alicia Molik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 89/224 of Alicia Molik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Alicia Molik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5%
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1%
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6%
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1%
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Alicia Molik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.