H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-3

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–2 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–0 on clay, while Jie Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2012 Rome second round 6-2 6-1.

CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-2 6-1 Jie Zheng #33 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #54 3-6 6-3 6-2 Jie Zheng #25 Match data
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jie Zheng #37 6-1 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 Match data
May 16, 2007* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-2 6-2 Jie Zheng #48 Match data
Mar 3, 2005* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Jie Zheng #65 7-6(4) 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11