H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-0
Jie Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2005 Strasbourg third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2005* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jie Zheng | 6-4 6-2 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |