Jie Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jie Zheng and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2010 Canadian Open first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data | Aug 18, 2010* | R64 | Canadian Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 7-6(5) | Jie Zheng | Match data | Apr 13, 2007* | R16 | Charleston Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,906 | 218 | 196 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,851 | 225 | 206 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #120 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #26 | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,687 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2000 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2001 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2005 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2006 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2010 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2011 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2012 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2014 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 143 | 126 | 269 | 53.2% | 48 | 44 | 92 | 52.2% | 24 | 22 | 46 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | 124 | 114 | 238 | 52.1% | 82 | 63 | 145 | 56.6% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 180/318 of Katarina Srebotnik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2004 | 5/28 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 67.1% | 53.1% | 34.7% | 39.7% | 34.3% | 47.4% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 3/39 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 73.6% | 54.5% | 45.8% | 58.2% | 43.9% | 52.9% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 24/41 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 72.3% | 57.7% | 47.0% | 48.1% | 46.4% | 54.3% | 46.5% | 2003 | 5/49 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 61.3% | 64.2% | 49.5% | 61.9% | 41.5% | 58.3% | 43.3% |
| 23 | 2007 | 16/17 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 71.3% | 62.6% | 45.3% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 57.9% | 45.5% | 2004 | 6/33 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 60.5% | 56.9% | 38.9% | 36.1% | 56.4% | 50.5% | 46.9% |
| 24 | 2008 | 24/33 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 64.9% | 62.6% | 48.5% | 56.7% | 50.6% | 57.3% | 47.3% | 2005 | 6/45 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 63.8% | 61.5% | 44.7% | 52.3% | 49.0% | 55.8% | 42.7% |
| 25 | 2009 | 44/48 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 45.8% | 2006 | 40/54 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 65.7% | 67.5% | 47.7% | 56.2% | 51.5% | 60.8% | 45.8% |
| 26 | 2010 | 39/41 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 69.7% | 57.6% | 43.9% | 55.1% | 47.7% | 53.4% | 45.3% | 2007 | 47/51 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 67.2% | 65.3% | 45.8% | 54.6% | 48.1% | 58.9% | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2011 | 36/41 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 73.5% | 57.0% | 40.0% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 42.9% | 2008 | 57/66 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 61.1% | 69.0% | 50.3% | 53.3% | 48.9% | 61.8% | 45.4% |
| 28 | 2012 | 38/49 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 68.6% | 60.5% | 46.7% | 49.0% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 44.8% | 2009 | 7/7 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 61.4% | 58.3% | 39.0% | 43.0% | 48.9% | 50.9% | 42.2% |
| 29 | 2013 | 33/34 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 70.4% | 56.4% | 44.3% | 47.0% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 44.4% | 2010 | 12/13 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 63.1% | 62.2% | 43.3% | 51.9% | 36.2% | 55.5% | 38.2% |
| 30 | 2014 | 23/25 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 70.5% | 57.6% | 42.9% | 53.2% | 57.7% | 53.1% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 64.7% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 61.5% | 14.3% | 41.2% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 286/414 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.1% | 58.9% | 44.8% | 51.2% | 49.4% | 54.7% | 44.9% | — | 180/431 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 66.0% | 47.0% | 53.4% | 48.4% | 59.3% | 44.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1507 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.03 | 1999 | 1520 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +131 | — | 48.9% | -0.04 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | +1.91 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1536 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 51.6% | +0.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 2000 | 1450 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +97 | — | 34.4% | -0.79 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.6 | +0.46 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1547 | 127.3 | -2.88 | -1.53 | 0.755 | 43.6% | +22 | +39 | -34 | 39.7% | -0.48 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–0 | — | +0.21 | 2001 | 1494 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +52 | — | 41.5% | -0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.5 | +0.12 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1702 | 131.1 | -0.46 | -1.44 | 0.823 | 45.8% | -19 | -40 | — | 55.4% | +0.42 | 11–5 (69%) | 4–3 (57%) | 107.3 | -0.22 | 2002 | 1724 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -4 | -229 | 55.9% | +0.46 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–6 (25%) | 103.9 | -0.69 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1778 | 132.0 | -1.03 | +1.40 | 1.019 | 50.5% | -50 | -22 | -207 | 58.9% | +0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–3 (73%) | 103.8 | -0.42 | 2003 | 1682 | 127.1 | +1.15 | +0.28 | 1.039 | 50.6% | -14 | +27 | -125 | 47.2% | -0.10 | 9–7 (56%) | 4–6 (40%) | 100.2 | +0.07 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1690 | 124.7 | +1.30 | +1.45 | 1.082 | 51.4% | -13 | +33 | — | 45.9% | -0.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 91.7 | -0.24 | 2004 | 1604 | 113.1 | -1.79 | +0.77 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -16 | +108 | -137 | 42.3% | -0.62 | 3–4 (43%) | 0–4 (0%) | 94.7 | +0.35 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1845 | 147.4 | +1.86 | +3.35 | 1.109 | 52.4% | -68 | -101 | -119 | 59.7% | +1.01 | 7–1 (88%) | 2–3 (40%) | 107.4 | -2.42 | 2005 | 1754 | 134.9 | +0.20 | -0.62 | 0.965 | 49.0% | -3 | -80 | -248 | 58.5% | +0.66 | 10–8 (56%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.2 | +0.75 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1782 | 142.7 | +1.41 | +2.49 | 1.073 | 51.6% | +25 | -47 | -70 | 54.5% | +0.39 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.2 | -0.17 | 2006 | 1787 | 145.5 | +3.94 | +1.32 | 1.169 | 53.1% | +10 | -81 | -227 | 56.3% | +0.69 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–7 (36%) | 96.4 | +0.95 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1763 | 139.6 | -1.89 | +1.53 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +49 | -45 | -75 | 52.6% | -0.01 | 9–6 (60%) | 7–0 (100%) | 106.1 | +0.54 | 2007 | 1757 | 138.6 | +2.28 | +1.88 | 1.106 | 52.0% | +11 | -27 | -168 | 54.1% | +0.25 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.0 | +0.63 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1705 | 120.3 | -2.95 | -0.51 | 0.903 | 47.7% | +56 | -98 | -88 | 43.9% | -0.58 | 9–9 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.0 | +0.59 | 2008 | 1834 | 150.3 | +5.53 | +1.46 | 1.188 | 53.5% | -27 | +6 | -230 | 61.6% | +1.10 | 10–13 (43%) | 4–12 (25%) | 93.8 | -1.10 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1653 | 131.5 | +0.57 | +1.44 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +36 | -75 | +52 | 49.5% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.4 | -0.25 | 2009 | 1744 | 104.1 | -2.58 | -0.87 | 0.860 | 46.8% | -28 | — | — | 35.3% | -1.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1688 | 126.6 | -2.38 | +0.84 | 0.941 | 48.5% | -1 | -50 | — | 47.5% | -0.36 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 107.5 | +0.29 | 2010 | 1623 | 113.9 | -1.08 | -2.93 | 0.858 | 46.9% | +1 | +158 | — | 33.3% | -1.18 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.3 | +0.28 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1670 | 119.0 | -1.86 | +0.63 | 0.939 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +57 | 46.2% | -0.42 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.8 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1648 | 95.9 | -0.62 | -1.23 | 0.644 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1906 | 137.9 | -0.68 | +1.30 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +7 | -35 | -39 | 50.9% | +0.03 | 73–58 (56%) | 47–31 (60%) | 109.8 | -0.49 | — | 1852 | 138.0 | +3.03 | +1.03 | 1.101 | 51.9% | -9 | +24 | -194 | 51.5% | +0.22 | 63–72 (47%) | 32–53 (38%) | 91.4 | +0.83 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jun 21, 2008 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 10, 2008 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 19, 2008 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 8, 2008 | H2H |