H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-1
Jie Zheng and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Jie Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2010 Montreal second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2010* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2007* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 7-6(5) | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |