H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 2-1
Jie Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2012 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-3 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 5-7 6-3 6-0 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2009* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 7-5 6-3 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |