H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 2-1

Jie Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2012 Australian Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #38 6-3 6-3 Marion Bartoli #9 Match data Jan 22, 2012* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jie Zheng #35 5-7 6-3 6-0 Marion Bartoli #11 Match data Jan 23, 2010* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Marion Bartoli #13 7-5 6-3 Jie Zheng #18 Match data Mar 7, 2009* SF Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,993 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Marion Bartoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,636 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,674 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,801 0 3
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,875 0 3
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,806 0 3
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,884 0 5
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,815 0 5
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,926 0 7
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,819 0 7
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,802 1 8
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Marion Bartoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 11 24 54.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 21 15 36 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 21 20 41 51.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2006 37 17 54 68.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 21 20 41 51.2% 14 7 21 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 21 16 37 56.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2009 34 14 48 70.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 27 14 41 65.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 39 18 57 68.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 31 16 47 66.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 277 172 449 61.7% 56 61 117 47.9% 58 25 83 69.9% 11 9 20 55.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Marion Bartoli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/41 2.0 3.5 61.8% 57.6% 36.8% 60.4% 56.3% 49.9% 41.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/49 1.4 3.6 64.9% 56.3% 43.5% 64.9% 57.5% 51.9% 47.3%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% 2005 9/51 0.8 1.3 69.1% 57.1% 43.5% 51.2% 51.4% 52.7% 48.9%
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% 2006 38/73 1.4 2.5 68.5% 60.5% 45.0% 53.5% 47.4% 55.7% 45.6%
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2007 70/78 1.7 3.1 66.7% 63.9% 44.6% 52.7% 50.5% 57.5% 46.4%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2008 54/56 2.0 4.3 62.5% 64.0% 44.4% 47.8% 46.1% 56.5% 45.5%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2009 61/68 2.2 4.3 61.0% 65.9% 45.5% 45.9% 51.9% 58.1% 48.7%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2010 51/57 3.3 4.7 59.7% 70.0% 47.7% 48.2% 50.8% 60.8% 45.5%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% 2011 73/86 3.1 4.5 59.0% 68.8% 47.3% 56.8% 53.1% 59.8% 49.3%
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% 2012 63/66 2.7 6.7 57.6% 66.8% 43.6% 52.6% 52.1% 56.9% 46.9%
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% 2013 32/38 2.3 7.6 58.5% 66.7% 44.0% 55.3% 53.1% 57.5% 46.8%
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 460/669 2.4 4.5 61.8% 65.6% 45.2% 51.8% 50.9% 57.7% 47.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Marion Bartoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1484 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1512 120.3 — — — — +49 — — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) — — -0.04
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 2003 1637 133.4 -0.70 +0.08 0.819 46.0% +31 -124 -53 48.3% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–1 (89%) 105.6 -0.73
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2004 1674 131.9 -1.04 +1.09 0.984 50.1% +23 -166 -97 58.8% +0.71 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.44
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2005 1632 133.1 -1.32 +1.68 1.034 50.8% +17 — -23 55.0% +0.78 5–7 (42%) 2–7 (22%) 94.0 +1.61
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2006 1801 139.5 -0.51 +0.92 1.028 50.7% +32 -303 -174 60.1% +0.86 11–9 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 +3.77
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2007 1875 142.0 +2.12 +2.52 1.092 51.8% -79 -152 +82 59.0% +0.72 12–8 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 102.9 +1.20
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2008 1807 142.6 +1.65 +1.46 1.045 50.9% +6 -164 +85 56.1% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–3 (75%) 99.2 +2.91
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2009 1885 150.4 +2.39 +4.50 1.163 53.2% +28 -227 -2 67.1% +1.29 14–4 (78%) 6–3 (67%) 110.3 +1.28
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2010 1815 147.0 +4.48 +1.93 1.161 53.0% +45 -192 +84 63.8% +0.97 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 95.4 +2.32
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 2011 1927 155.9 +4.15 +5.80 1.227 54.4% -14 -156 +107 65.1% +1.25 15–6 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -1.14
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 2012 1820 145.9 +1.09 +3.31 1.088 51.8% +54 -143 +153 60.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–2 (75%) 102.8 +4.07
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 2013 1803 132.3 +1.80 +2.75 1.100 52.3% -34 -141 +327 63.5% +0.66 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +1.37
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 1993 148.0 +2.18 +3.05 1.112 52.3% +12 -176 +67 60.1% +0.77 93–77 (55%) 58–37 (61%) 105.9 +2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.