H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jie Zheng vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 0-1
Patty Schnyder holds a 1–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2011 Dubai third round 1-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 1-6 6-0 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Patty Schnyder | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 |