H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jill Cooper vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 3-2
Jill Cooper holds a 3–2 lead over Shirley Bloomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jill Cooper leads 3–1 on clay, while Shirley Bloomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jill Cooper won the 1971 Guildford semifinal 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1971* | Guildford | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jill Cooper | 6-3 6-0 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1971* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jill Cooper | 6-2 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| May 14, 1970* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Shirley Bloomer | 4-6 6-4 9-7 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1970* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jill Cooper | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1969* | Barnes | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Shirley Bloomer | 6-3 6-3 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Cooper | — | — | — | 1,829 | 106 | 86 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Shirley Bloomer | — | — | — | 1,769 | 84 | 56 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jill Cooper | Shirley Bloomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 18–7 | 72.0% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 36–19 | 65.5% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |