H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jill Cooper vs Veronica Burton H2H: 3-0
Jill Cooper holds a 3–0 lead over Veronica Burton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jill Cooper leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Cooper won the 1972 Beckenham fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1972* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Jill Cooper | 6-2 6-1 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1970* | Cannes | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Jill Cooper | 6-3 6-0 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1968* | Queen's Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jill Cooper | 7-5 6-3 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Cooper | — | — | — | 1,829 | 106 | 86 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Veronica Burton | — | — | — | 1,832 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Cooper | Veronica Burton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1969 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1970 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 39–20 | 66.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1971 | 36–19 | 65.5% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 3 |