H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 0-3
Ai Sugiyama holds a 3–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2009 Sydney third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2009* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 6-3 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ai Sugiyama | 7-5 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Ai Sugiyama | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |