H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 6-1

Jill Craybas holds a 6–1 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2012 Charleston Open round of 64 7-6(2) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #137 7-6(2) 7-6(6) Akgul Amanmuradova #118 Match data Apr 4, 2012* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Jill Craybas #105 6-3 6-3 Akgul Amanmuradova #73 Match data Apr 28, 2011* R32 Barcelona International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Akgul Amanmuradova #60 7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 Jill Craybas #125 Match data Sep 24, 2010* R16 Tashkent International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #110 7-6(10) 7-5 Akgul Amanmuradova #105 Match data Jul 15, 2010* R32 Palermo International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Jill Craybas #70 7-6(1) 6-2 Akgul Amanmuradova #78 Match data Sep 26, 2008* R16 Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #72 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Akgul Amanmuradova #67 Match data Apr 9, 2008* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Jill Craybas #77 6-4 6-0 Akgul Amanmuradova #94 Match data Feb 9, 2008* SF Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0%
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6%
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.73
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.30
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.76
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.19 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.64
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.70 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.02 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.79
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.31 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.12 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.20 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.82 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.71 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.05 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.