H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 6-1

Jill Craybas holds a 6–1 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 4–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2012 Charleston second round 7-6(2) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
UZB Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 4, 2012* Charleston WTA 500 R64 Clay Jill Craybas #137 7-6(2) 7-6(6) Akgul Amanmuradova #118 Match data
Apr 28, 2011* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Jill Craybas #105 6-3 6-3 Akgul Amanmuradova #73 Match data
Sep 24, 2010* Tashkent WTA 250 R16 Hard Akgul Amanmuradova #60 7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 Jill Craybas #125 Match data
Jul 15, 2010* Palermo WTA 250 R32 Clay Jill Craybas #110 7-6(10) 7-5 Akgul Amanmuradova #105 Match data
Sep 26, 2008* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Jill Craybas #70 7-6(1) 6-2 Akgul Amanmuradova #78 Match data
Apr 9, 2008* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Jill Craybas #72 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Akgul Amanmuradova #67 Match data
Feb 9, 2008* Pattaya WTA 250 SF Hard Jill Craybas #77 6-4 6-0 Akgul Amanmuradova #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,631 61 101 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,464 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,491 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,529 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2008 15–21 41.7% #82 1,530 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,542 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,580 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,494 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,457 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,484 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,483 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,490 0 0
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —