H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Anne Kremer H2H: 0-1

Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 1999 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #31 6-2 6-2 Jill Craybas #147 Match data Sep 1, 1999* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.