H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Anne Kremer H2H: 0-1
Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 1999 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anne Kremer | 6-2 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |