H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Barbara Schett H2H: 0-1
Barbara Schett holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2004 San Diego second round 7-5 6-7(8) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2004* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 7-5 6-7(8) 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |