H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-1
Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2004 Indian Wells second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-0 6-3 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |