H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Kix in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2002 Linz Open round of 32 6-2 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Daniela Kix | Match data | Oct 24, 2002* | R32 | Linz Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,693 | 161 | 257 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniela Kix | #953 | #190 | 140 | 1,500 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Daniela Kix | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #64 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,448 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Daniela Kix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 152 | 256 | 40.6% | 44 | 77 | 121 | 36.4% | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Daniela Kix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1484 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1488 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.11 | 2006 | 1476 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1473 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 1445 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 1450 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 1479 | 110.7 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -6 | — | 36.2% | -0.76 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.6 | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 1653 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -155 | -43 | 47.4% | -0.45 | 10–4 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 110.1 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1568 | 113.2 | -2.11 | -2.34 | 0.665 | 41.6% | +3 | -51 | +44 | 41.7% | -0.71 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 99.2 | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 1496 | 110.5 | +0.38 | -0.09 | 1.027 | 50.9% | +36 | -67 | +114 | 36.4% | -0.95 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.3 | +1.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 1613 | 122.1 | -2.41 | +0.28 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -42 | -142 | +91 | 47.6% | -0.21 | 8–11 (42%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.0 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 1568 | 125.6 | -2.28 | +0.59 | 0.968 | 49.4% | +22 | -85 | +99 | 43.4% | -0.28 | 6–9 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.1 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 1472 | 114.0 | -3.51 | -1.24 | 0.880 | 47.3% | +42 | -2 | +117 | 36.0% | -1.19 | 3–8 (27%) | 4–5 (44%) | 95.0 | -1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 1571 | 125.0 | -1.47 | +1.80 | 1.013 | 50.2% | +18 | -32 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 4–7 (36%) | 7–8 (47%) | 97.9 | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 1591 | 120.2 | -2.51 | -0.54 | 0.914 | 48.2% | +29 | -121 | — | 39.5% | -0.76 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.8 | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 1546 | 110.5 | -3.17 | -1.80 | 0.858 | 46.7% | +33 | -58 | -16 | 34.6% | -1.23 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 1442 | 107.4 | -4.00 | -4.02 | 0.783 | 44.8% | +81 | 0 | — | 30.0% | -1.53 | 2–6 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 1449 | 101.1 | -4.12 | -1.62 | 0.786 | 44.7% | +63 | +2 | — | 38.1% | -1.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.9 | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1451 | 96.4 | -3.73 | -1.77 | 0.738 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1694 | 119.3 | -2.71 | -0.73 | 0.898 | 47.7% | +18 | -60 | +55 | 40.2% | -0.73 | 58–79 (42%) | 41–43 (49%) | 96.8 | +0.80 | — | 1500 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -8.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 16, 2010 | H2H |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | 6 | 1 | 7 | Apr 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 4, 2011 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 0 | 6 | 6 | Apr 21, 2011 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Oct 21, 2010 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 16, 2006 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 24, 2002 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 13, 2002 | H2H |