H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 1-0

Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2002 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #102 6-4 7-5 Kristina Brandi #96 Match data Jun 12, 2002* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Kristina Brandi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Kristina Brandi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 26/91 of Kristina Brandi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Kristina Brandi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/44 0.0 2.0 68.9% 53.9% 46.7% 54.6% 44.8% 51.1% 42.5%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2005 9/27 0.2 2.7 71.1% 54.4% 43.5% 56.7% 32.6% 51.4% 47.7%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2006 9/18 0.4 3.6 68.2% 53.7% 43.6% 43.3% 45.7% 50.6% 38.6%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2007 2/2 0.0 3.0 76.8% 58.0% 36.9% 63.3% 26.3% 53.2% 37.5%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 26/255 0.2 2.8 70.0% 54.3% 43.7% 52.1% 39.5% 51.2% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Kristina Brandi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.