H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-3

Jill Craybas and Lilia Osterloh are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2007 Quebec City third round 6-4 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 1, 2007* Quebec City WTA 500 R32 Hard Jill Craybas #95 6-4 2-6 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #77 Match data
Jul 26, 2007* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Lilia Osterloh #106 6-2 7-5 Jill Craybas #64 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Memphis WTA 500 QF Hard Jill Craybas #58 6-4 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #129 Match data
Aug 4, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lilia Osterloh #157 0-6 6-3 6-1 Jill Craybas #61 Match data
Apr 17, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Jill Craybas #108 6-2 6-0 Lilia Osterloh #60 Match data
Feb 22, 2001* Oklahoma City WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lilia Osterloh #51 7-6(2) 6-4 Jill Craybas #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —