H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Amelia Island third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2008* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Lindsay Davenport | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |