H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 0-1

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #24 6-2 6-3 Jill Craybas #64 Match data Jun 25, 2004* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Magdalena Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3
20 — — — — — — — 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6
22 — — — — — — — 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Magdalena Maleeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 28/138 of Magdalena Maleeva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Magdalena Maleeva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2003 7/48 2.1 2.6 64.6% 65.7% 49.3% 52.1% 35.7% 60.1% 48.6%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2004 10/53 2.0 3.1 65.6% 62.8% 41.0% 62.8% 38.6% 55.5% 48.1%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2005 11/37 1.9 2.1 65.1% 64.7% 46.3% 46.7% 61.5% 58.4% 48.3%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 28/664 2.0 2.6 65.2% 64.3% 45.2% 53.8% 46.9% 57.8% 48.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Magdalena Maleeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.