H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Marta Domachowska H2H: 0-5

Marta Domachowska holds a 5–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marta Domachowska leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marta Domachowska won the 2008 Bali round of 16 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main-draw meetings
Marta Domachowska
POL Age 40 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marta Domachowska #57 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 Jill Craybas #76 Match data Sep 12, 2008* R16 Bali Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marta Domachowska #65 6-1 3-6 6-4 Jill Craybas #78 Match data Jun 25, 2008* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marta Domachowska #87 6-4 0-6 7-6(6) Jill Craybas #68 Match data Mar 25, 2008* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Marta Domachowska #61 7-6(0) 6-2 Jill Craybas #49 Match data May 25, 2006* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Marta Domachowska #51 6-1 6-0 Jill Craybas #58 Match data Feb 25, 2006* SF Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marta Domachowska #943 #37 1,002 1,675 67 99 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Marta Domachowska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #350 1,485 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–3 0.0% #252 1,439 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 12–7 63.2% #73 1,611 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #59 1,550 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 12–23 34.3% #91 1,521 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #143 1,550 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 14–17 45.2% #65 1,572 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2009 5–12 29.4% #137 1,525 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2010 0–4 0.0% #296 1,468 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #228 1,463 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2013 0–2 0.0% #437 1,433 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Marta Domachowska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 9 14 23 39.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 14 24 41.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 11 20 45.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 40 57 97 41.2% 24 34 58 41.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Marta Domachowska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1439 94.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.13 0–2 — — +0.53
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1612 129.9 — — — — -28 0 — 59.0% +0.85 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 +0.30
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1550 117.6 -0.14 +0.44 1.060 51.2% -26 +112 — 44.4% -0.17 9–8 (53%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 +2.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1521 120.2 -0.85 -1.92 0.921 48.1% +23 +45 +16 37.7% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.58
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2007 1551 118.1 -1.07 -1.16 0.947 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 — — -0.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1573 121.8 -1.08 +0.91 0.968 49.2% 0 +2 -16 45.2% -0.52 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -0.23
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2009 1525 106.1 -2.40 -1.19 0.891 47.7% +2 +22 — 38.1% -0.79 2–6 (25%) — — -0.02
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2010 1469 92.7 -2.74 -2.38 0.739 42.9% +25 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–2 0–1 — +0.45
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2012 1464 101.6 -0.94 -1.83 0.940 48.3% — — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 — — +0.18
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2013 1434 95.1 -1.11 -1.51 0.705 41.8% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.25
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1676 121.0 -1.28 -0.62 0.930 48.4% 0 +48 -2 42.1% -0.48 23–31 (43%) 16–14 (53%) 98.7 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.