H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Martina Sucha H2H: 2-0

Jill Craybas holds a 2–0 lead over Martina Sucha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2005 Hasselt round of 32 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Martina Sucha
SVK Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #48 7-6(5) 6-1 Martina Sucha #73 Match data Oct 27, 2005* R32 Hasselt Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #84 6-3 6-3 Martina Sucha #73 Match data May 12, 2005* R32 Prague Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martina Sucha #948 #37 859 1,730 96 126 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Martina Sucha
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #135 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 4–4 50.0% #113 1,526 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 13–10 56.5% #65 1,637 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2002 20–24 45.5% #64 1,591 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2003 4–15 21.1% #89 1,493 0 1
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2004 20–19 51.3% #56 1,610 0 2
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2005 14–25 35.9% #93 1,534 0 2
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2006 17–19 47.2% #83 1,617 0 2
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2007 4–9 30.8% #173 1,550 0 2
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Martina Sucha
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 11 14 21.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 14 11 25 56.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 61 67 128 47.7% 27 45 72 37.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Martina Sucha
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1527 110.3 — — — — +52 — — 44.4% -0.11 2–0 0–1 — +0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1637 123.2 — — — — +22 -126 — 51.9% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 2–0 — +0.76
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2002 1592 123.3 — — — — +36 -57 +16 47.6% -0.26 7–10 (41%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +0.78
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 99.3 -2.12 -0.63 0.771 44.0% +39 -21 — 27.3% -1.71 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.47
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2004 1611 109.3 -1.31 -3.24 0.674 42.7% +12 -82 — 48.9% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–4 (64%) 105.1 +2.54
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2005 1534 107.1 -2.10 -3.29 0.733 43.5% +18 -64 — 40.4% -0.62 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.87
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2006 1617 115.0 -2.64 -0.86 0.922 48.4% -19 -90 -113 46.3% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.8 -0.53
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2007 1551 108.4 -3.53 +0.21 0.853 46.0% +34 -60 — 38.2% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 0–1 — -0.37
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1730 116.0 -2.53 -1.32 0.835 46.1% +20 -73 -39 44.3% -0.42 36–41 (47%) 19–16 (54%) 101.4 +2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.