H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-0

Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2002 Australian Open round of 128 4-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #111 4-0 (ret.) Mary Pierce #156 Match data Jan 16, 2002* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 — — — — — — — 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 — — — — — — — 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 60/152 of Mary Pierce's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Mary Pierce
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2%
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.