H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 1-2

Mathilde Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mathilde Johansson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2012 Bastad round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Mathilde Johansson
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mathilde Johansson #83 6-4 6-1 Jill Craybas #144 Match data Jul 19, 2012* R32 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Jill Craybas #83 2-6 6-2 6-0 Mathilde Johansson #133 Match data Oct 16, 2009* R16 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Mathilde Johansson #87 6-2 1-6 7-5 Jill Craybas #65 Match data Jan 21, 2009* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mathilde Johansson #235 #59 992 1,616 44 75 37.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Mathilde Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #184 1,497 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #140 1,491 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 2–5 28.6% #134 1,477 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2008 3–7 30.0% #85 1,474 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2009 8–13 38.1% #125 1,470 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2010 0–3 0.0% #102 1,450 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2011 10–11 47.6% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2012 12–15 44.4% #87 1,581 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2013 8–15 34.8% #136 1,538 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #207 1,526 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #173 1,514 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Mathilde Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 8 26 34 23.5% 31 43 74 41.9% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 103/119 of Mathilde Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Mathilde Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 0.0 2.0 57.4% 48.4% 34.8% 58.3% 0.0% 42.6% 26.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/3 0.5 3.0 59.7% 53.3% 37.1% 66.2% 20.8% 47.3% 37.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/7 0.7 6.2 54.6% 58.1% 40.8% 39.7% 33.5% 50.7% 43.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 8/10 1.3 6.0 61.3% 54.6% 38.3% 42.3% 41.4% 48.0% 42.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 17/21 0.9 8.2 57.7% 57.6% 41.7% 49.6% 49.0% 50.9% 43.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/3 0.0 7.0 61.1% 59.7% 31.4% 50.6% 30.0% 49.2% 36.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 20/21 1.4 6.4 58.9% 61.5% 41.1% 48.5% 51.7% 53.5% 46.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 25/27 0.4 6.1 64.7% 58.6% 43.1% 49.3% 51.5% 53.0% 48.8%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2013 19/23 0.9 8.2 57.7% 58.6% 39.9% 44.8% 39.2% 50.8% 44.1%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2014 2/2 0.5 9.0 59.6% 66.1% 35.6% 58.3% 31.0% 53.5% 37.3%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2015 1/1 3.0 4.0 49.2% 63.3% 25.8% 22.2% 62.5% 44.3% 46.5%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 103/119 0.9 6.8 59.8% 58.7% 40.7% 47.6% 45.2% 51.4% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Mathilde Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1498 100.7 +1.49 +1.81 0.467 35.8% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.24
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 2006 1492 91.7 -1.86 -1.85 0.702 42.6% — +32 — 33.3% -2.50 — — — +0.26
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1477 106.6 -1.95 -1.02 0.889 46.9% +6 — — 33.3% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2008 1475 101.5 -1.92 +0.35 0.808 45.1% -22 +96 — 29.2% -1.88 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.30
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2009 1471 105.9 -3.20 -1.71 0.879 47.2% -6 +49 — 41.2% -1.10 4–7 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 +0.58
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2010 1450 104.0 +0.47 -0.49 0.725 43.7% — +29 — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.32
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2011 1534 117.2 -2.08 +1.17 1.003 50.1% -62 +28 — 51.0% 0.00 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 98.9 -0.16
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2012 1582 115.4 -2.40 +2.48 1.039 50.8% -144 +87 — 47.8% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.7 +0.87
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2013 1538 102.8 -3.58 -0.60 0.896 47.4% -107 +28 +56 40.0% -0.91 3–6 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.5 +0.22
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2014 1526 103.1 +0.52 +2.59 0.803 45.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.39
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2015 1514 97.9 -0.76 +0.19 0.834 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.04
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2016 1471 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1616 110.5 -2.45 +0.43 0.924 48.2% -61 +51 +56 40.6% -0.79 17–28 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 96.4 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.