H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-1

Jill Craybas and Maureen Drake are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on grass, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2003 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #76 6-3 6-1 Maureen Drake #123 Match data Aug 13, 2003* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Maureen Drake #110 6-2 6-2 Jill Craybas #91 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 5/15 of Maureen Drake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Maureen Drake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% 2003 3/11 5.0 3.0 70.6% 61.6% 38.1% 55.6% 53.7% 54.7% 41.3%
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% 2004 2/4 0.5 3.5 59.5% 53.5% 46.5% 45.4% 44.4% 50.3% 40.3%
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 5/133 3.2 3.2 66.2% 58.4% 41.5% 51.6% 50.0% 52.9% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.