H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-1
Jill Craybas and Maureen Drake are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on grass, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2003 Toronto second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 6-3 6-1 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Maureen Drake | 6-2 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Maureen Drake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |