H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-2

Nicole Pratt holds a 2–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Pratt leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2006 Hobart third round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2006* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Jill Craybas #56 7-5 7-5 Nicole Pratt #120 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicole Pratt #57 7-5 6-0 Jill Craybas #74 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Shanghai WTA 250 R32 Hard Nicole Pratt #65 6-4 6-3 Jill Craybas #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —