H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Paola Suarez H2H: 3-2

Jill Craybas holds a 3–2 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2007 Auckland quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Paola Suarez
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 6, 2007* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Jill Craybas #70 6-3 7-6(4) Paola Suarez #178 Match data
Mar 28, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jill Craybas #73 4-6 6-4 7-6(2) Paola Suarez #13 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jill Craybas #91 6-4 5-7 7-5 Paola Suarez #32 Match data
Apr 12, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Paola Suarez #52 6-0 6-0 Jill Craybas #109 Match data
Jan 7, 2000* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Paola Suarez #72 6-2 6-2 Jill Craybas #175 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,916 223 180 55.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,556 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,535 0 1
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,597 0 1
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2000 27–22 55.1% #36 1,677 0 1
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,697 0 2
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,859 0 3
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2004 37–17 68.5% #16 1,804 0 4
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,712 0 4
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,699 0 4
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,689 0 4
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —