H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 0-1
Rachel Mcquillan holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 4-6 6-1 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rachel Mcquillan | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |