H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 1-2
Sandrine Testud holds a 2–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Charleston fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2002* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 6-3 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2001* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 6-1 7-5 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1999* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sandrine Testud | 7-6 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |