H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 0-1
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2001 Berlin second round 6-0 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2001* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Craybas | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |